Skip to content

Court Proceedings

Court Proceedings may be necessary when other methods of dispute resolution fail. In this formal legal process, a judge makes decisions regarding the matters in dispute.

This process is often used to resolve complex issues such as financial settlements on a divorce or child arrangements when the parties cannot reach an agreement through negotiation or other methods.

The process involves several stages, including preliminary hearings, evidence disclosure, and a final hearing where the judge will make a legally binding decision.

The benefits of the Court Proceedings process:

  • A final, legally binding decision is made if negotiations fail.
  • The court can provide protection in cases involving safety concerns, such as domestic violence.
  • Court orders are enforceable, ensuring compliance with the decisions made.
  • It provides a clear resolution when other methods have not been successful.
  • The process is conducted within a formal, structured legal framework.

To understand the hearing stages in more detail for financial settlements and children matters:

Financial Proceedings

When negotiations fail, court proceedings may be necessary to resolve financial disputes. The process typically involves three main stages:

  1. First Appointment (First Hearing):
    This initial hearing is mainly administrative. The court will decide what information and documents are needed to reach a fair decision. While it’s primarily procedural, there may be an opportunity for negotiation, depending on the case.
  2. Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) Hearing (Second Hearing):
    At this hearing, both parties present their positions, and the judge gives an indication of what they believe the likely outcome would be if the case were to proceed to a final hearing. The goal is to encourage settlement negotiations. However, the judge cannot make a binding decision at this stage (unless the parties agree the outcome), and the hearing is conducted on a 'Without Prejudice' basis, meaning discussions cannot be used against either party in future proceedings.
  3. Final Hearing (Third Hearing):
    If no settlement is reached, the case proceeds to a final hearing where the court will consider evidence from both parties and make a binding decision on the financial arrangements.

Children Act Proceedings

Court proceedings under the Children Act follow a slightly different process, which can vary depending on the nature of the application and the circumstances of the case:

  1. First Hearing Dispute Resolution Appointment (First Hearing):
    This hearing is primarily for the court to gather necessary information and issue directions, such as ordering expert reports to determine what is in the child's best interests. Sometimes the court will use this hearing to resolve issues early, so both parties should be prepared for active involvement.
  2. Dispute Resolution Appointment (Second Hearing):
    At this stage, the court aims to narrow the issues, review any expert evidence, and determine if any factual disputes require a separate hearing. In some cases, the court may take a more hands-on approach to move the case toward resolution.
  3. Final Hearing:
    If the case is not resolved earlier, the final hearing involves presenting evidence to the court, which will then make a binding decision. However, because circumstances can change, a final order may not prevent future applications to the court

Protective orders such as a non-molestation order or occupation order

When seeking protection from domestic abuse or the harmful actions of another party, the court can issue protective orders, such as Non-Molestation Orders or Occupation Orders. These orders are intended to safeguard individuals and their children from harm.

If the situation is urgent and you or your children are at immediate risk, the court can grant a Non-Molestation Order or Occupation Order on a "without notice" basis. This means the order is issued without notifying the other party or them being present at the hearing. The judge will assess the urgency and seriousness of the situation, and if they agree that protection is needed, an interim order may be granted to provide immediate safety until a full hearing can take place.